Arcs · active
Collimer Season 1
June 2026 – ongoing
Opens with the first Collimer build logs, before the product had a public name. Establishes the bet, the question, and the season's stakes. Subsequent posts track the build through to the collimer.com launch and beyond.
Ending question
Did our bet on the GEO space hold up after first contact with the market?
This arc closes when this question is answered honestly. Until then, every post in it is one step toward the answer.
Posts in this arc (11)
- 01
Every GEO tool ships a beautiful dashboard. We bet the value is the recommendation, and rebuilt Collimer so every rec is shippable as written.
- 02
An afternoon of Phoenix LiveView produced fourteen connected screens. The clickable mockup is the cheapest discovery tool we have for an AI product.
- 03
We wired three LLM providers through one probe runner. The output is a methodology card that shows exactly how each answer was produced.
- 04
Parallel Claude Code agents built the Collimer MVP end to end in about three days and 67 commits. The pace is only the headline. The point is what kept it from being a pile of code.
- 05
A scan in a second vertical revealed how SaaS-coded our probes were. The fix made us question whether 'alternatives' is even a real category for local services.
- 06
How to keep a marketing site in sync with the product it describes (ours wasn't)
Build log Collimer BuildCollimer's site and app live in separate repos, so we made the product's own pricing config the single source of truth pricing and engine claims sync from.
- 07
Collimer went live July 9: one LinkedIn post, 661 impressions, a handful of DMs, two design partners in and a third coming. Plus the numbers we cut before posting, and the competitor one-liner that did not survive our own fact-check.
- 08
The homepage now leads with recommendations, not a score. We built EXP-01 to measure the reframe before real traffic arrived.
- 09
Collimer's second launch-post cycle made two real decisions: name a real competitor directly instead of gesturing at 'tools in the market,' and recontextualize the original ten-design-partner ambition instead of quietly replacing it.
- 10
A database-pool fix and a marketing-attribution default were both confidently wrong in the same shape: each cited its own rationale, and nobody had checked that rationale against the actual code.
- 11
A Chrome process wired as a permanent child of the root supervisor exhausted its restart budget when it failed to launch, and the exit cascaded into shutting down scans, dashboards, the API, and background jobs together.